@B_Eichengreen: “Secular stagnation is an economist’s Rorschach Test. It means different things to different people.” Contrary to a lot of public discussion, Larry’s thesis is about interest rates and supply/demand of capital, not technology change.
To quote Notorious BIG, “mo money mo problems“. In this case, mo money equals not enough productive places and projects to put it. As economists do, Larry then proposes a series of reforms to address the dynamic, few of which seem politically likely.
Can the goal be to get to normal if there is no normal? Or should the goal be something else?
Source Tweets: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17